SmartRGPT: An NLP-Based Conversational Research Support System Designed Using Open- Source RAG and LLM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2026/v63i3/172070Keywords:
Conversational AI, Generative AI, LangChain, Large Language Models (LLM), Llama-3, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), SmartRGPT, SmartRLibraryAbstract
This case study research aims to focus on designing a conversational Research Support System (RSS) named SmartRGPT using open-source Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and a Large Language Model (LLM) to enhance and address the challenges faced by researchers while using the existing Research Support Services called SmartRLibrary (initiated by and applied in B C Roy Memorial Library, alternatively, IIM Calcutta Library). It also addresses the limitations of traditional keyword-based search and the hallucination issues of standalone LLM. The prototype has been designed using several open-source software components, including the RAG pipeline, LangChain, the ChromaDB vector database, and the Llama-3 (70-billion-parameter model). A curated set of over 250 datasets was collected, preprocessed, and ingested using Wget (WarcGPT framework) for preparing the knowledge base. The prototype was tested and evaluated using real-world queries. Based on internal review and initial observations of the authors on the generated responses, in the majority of tested cases, the findings demonstrate that the proposed system generated accurate, context‑aware responses without hallucinations. It has responded to short and long-range queries based on its ingested knowledge bases, citing the sources as references. The findings further indicate that the proposed system has the potential to provide 24/7 personalised research assistance, reduce repetitive library workload, and enable the library to provide more advanced services if applied after rigorous evaluation in larger populations. Its cost-effective open-source architecture also offers libraries with limited budgets an independent and customisable alternative to vendor-dependent solutions, thereby contributing to the advancement of the Library and Information Science (LIS) domain.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information and Knowledge

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
References
Agrawal, G., Kumarage, T., Alghamdi, Z., & Liu, H. (2024). Can knowledge graphs reduce hallucinations in LLMs? A survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacllong. 219
Balakrishnan, G., & Purwar, A. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of open-source LLMs in enterprise-specific RAG systems: A comparative study of performance and scalability. 2024 IEEE 21st India Council International Conference, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON63790.2024.10958508
Bevara, R. V. K., Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., Karedla, S. P., Mohammed, Y., Kolapudi, S. T., & Mannuru, A. (2025). Prospects of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for academic library search and retrieval. Information Technology and Libraries, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.5860/ ital.v44i2.17361
Boateng, F. (2025). The transformative potential of generative AI in academic library access services: Opportunities and challenges. Information Services and Use, 45(1-2), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/18758789251332800
Chen, J., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2024). Benchmarking large language models in retrieval-augmented generation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 38, 17754-17762. https://doi. org/10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29728
Cheung, H. C., Lo, Y. Y. M., Chiu, D. K. W., & Kong, E. W. S. (2023). Development of smart academic library services with internet of things technology: A qualitative study in Hong Kong. Library Hi Tech, 43(1), 398-422. https://doi. org/10.1108/LHT-06-2023-0219
Cox, A. (2022). The ethics of AI for information professionals: Eight scenarios. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 71(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10 .1080/24750158.2022.2084885
Cox, A. M., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2018). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Computation and Language. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401
Li, L., & Coates, K. (2024). Academic library online chat services under the impact of artificial intelligence. Information Discovery and Delivery, 53(2), 192-205. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IDD-11-2023-0143
Mazumder, J., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2024). Designing questionanswer- based search system in libraries: Application of open source retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipeline. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 255-260. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2024/v61i5/171583
Mukhopadhyay, P. (2026). Optimizing retrieval in libraries through RAG: A framework. Indian Journal of Information Library and Society, 37(1-2), 6-22.
Ovadia, O., Brief, M., Mishaeli, M., & Elisha, O. (2024). Fine-tuning or retrieval? Comparing knowledge injection in LLMs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.15
Safdar, M., Siddique, N., Gulzar, A., Yasin, H., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Does ChatGPT generate fake results? Challenges in retrieving content through ChatGPT. Digital Library Perspectives, 40(4), 668-680. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-01-2024-0006
Vakilzadeh, H., & Wood, D. A. (2025). The development of a RAGbased artificial intelligence research assistant. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5283702
Yan, S.-Q., Gu, J.-C., Zhu, Y., & Ling, Z.-H. (2024). Corrective retrieval augmented generation. arXiv. https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.5267341
Zheng, X., Li, Z., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Beyond decomposition: Hierarchical dependency management in multi-document question answering. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(5), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24971
Jhantu Mazumder




